Huntress Acquires Inside Agent: A New Era for Identity ProtectionFree Trial
Back to Blog
Red Team & Penetration Testing

Purple Teaming: How to Get Red and Blue Working Together

For years, red teams and blue teams operated in silos. The red team runs an engagement, writes a report, throws it over the wall. The blue team reads the report, feels bad about what they missed, and…

30 Mar 20262 min read0 views

Introduction

For years, red teams and blue teams operated in silos. The red team runs an engagement, writes a report, throws it over the wall. The blue team reads the report, feels bad about what they missed, and maybe fixes a few things. Three months later, neither side remembers the details. This adversarial dynamic wastes enormous amounts of time and talent.

What Purple Teaming Actually Is

Purple teaming is not a separate team. It is a methodology where red and blue work together in real time, executing attack techniques and validating detections collaboratively. The red team executes a technique — say, credential dumping from LSASS memory. The blue team watches their SIEM and EDR dashboards in real time. Did the alert fire? Was the alert actionable? If not, they tune the detection together, then rerun the technique to validate the fix.

This feedback loop compresses what used to take months into hours. Instead of discovering detection gaps in a report and fixing them over the next quarter, you discover and fix them in the same session.

Structuring a Purple Team Exercise

Use the MITRE ATT&CK framework as your playbook. Select 10-15 techniques relevant to your threat profile. For each technique, document the expected data sources, the current detection rules, and the expected alert behavior. Then execute.

A typical session looks like this: red team announces "we are going to execute T1059.001 — PowerShell execution with encoded command" and runs the technique. Blue team confirms or denies detection. If detected, record the detection rule ID, time to detect, and fidelity. If not detected, work together to build the detection, deploy it, and retest. Document everything in a shared matrix.

Measuring Success

Track detection coverage over time as a percentage of tested ATT&CK techniques. In my experience, organizations typically start at 20-30% coverage and reach 60-70% after four quarterly purple team exercises. The remaining 30-40% usually requires new data sources or architectural changes that take longer to implement.

Also track mean time to detect (MTTD) for techniques you can detect. Getting an alert is not enough — if it takes six hours for the alert to fire and another two hours for an analyst to triage it, an attacker has eight hours of undetected activity. Purple teaming helps you optimize both the detection rule and the triage process.

The adversaries are not playing red team vs blue team. They are playing against your entire security organization. Your teams should be doing the same.

Comments

Keep Reading

Explore Related Topics and Insights

Insider Threat Detection Without Becoming Big Brother
EMERGING THREATS

Insider Threat Detection Without Becoming Big Brother

Insider threat programs have a PR problem. Announce that you are monitoring employee behavior and you will get pushback from HR, legal, works councils, and the employees themselves. And they are not w…

S

Spakto Team

30 Mar 2026
Read article →
Cloud Security Posture Management: Choosing and Deploying CSPM
CLOUD SECURITY

Cloud Security Posture Management: Choosing and Deploying CSPM

When I ran a cloud security assessment for a logistics company last year, we found 847 misconfigurations across their AWS and Azure environments. Seventeen of them were critical — including an S3 buck…

S

Spakto Team

30 Mar 2026
Read article →
Secure Code Review: What Senior Engineers Actually Look For
APPLICATION SECURITY

Secure Code Review: What Senior Engineers Actually Look For

Automated tools find about 40% of security vulnerabilities in code. The other 60% — business logic flaws, race conditions, authorization bypasses, and subtle injection vectors — require human eyes. Af…

S

Spakto Team

30 Mar 2026
Read article →
Threat Hunting: Moving From Reactive to Proactive Security
THREAT INTELLIGENCE

Threat Hunting: Moving From Reactive to Proactive Security

Your SIEM generates alerts. Your EDR generates alerts. Your firewall generates alerts. You triage them, you respond to them, you close them. And then one day you discover that an attacker has been in…

S

Spakto Team

30 Mar 2026
Read article →
Securing the Software Build Pipeline: From Code to Production
APPLICATION SECURITY

Securing the Software Build Pipeline: From Code to Production

Your CI/CD pipeline is the most privileged system in your organization. It has access to source code, secrets, production credentials, cloud provider APIs, and the ability to deploy code that your use…

S

Spakto Team

30 Mar 2026
Read article →
Building a Security Culture That Outlasts Your CISO
EMERGING THREATS

Building a Security Culture That Outlasts Your CISO

I have seen security programs thrive under one CISO and collapse under their successor. I have seen organizations where security is everyone's responsibility and organizations where it is "the securit…

S

Spakto Team

30 Mar 2026
Read article →
Zero-Day Markets: The Economics of Vulnerability Trading
EMERGING THREATS

Zero-Day Markets: The Economics of Vulnerability Trading

A zero-day exploit for iOS full-chain remote code execution with persistence is worth between $1 million and $2.5 million on the private market. An Android equivalent fetches $2 to $2.5 million. A Chr…

S

Spakto Team

30 Mar 2026
Read article →
OT/ICS Security: Bridging the IT-OT Divide
EMERGING THREATS

OT/ICS Security: Bridging the IT-OT Divide

I spent the first half of my career in IT security and the last decade increasingly focused on operational technology. The cultural divide between IT and OT is wider than the technical one, and until…

S

Spakto Team

30 Mar 2026
Read article →