Huntress Acquires Inside Agent: A New Era for Identity ProtectionFree Trial
Menu
InvestorsCareersBlogAboutAcademySupportContact
LoginSign up
SECURITY ENGINEERING · MICROSOFT SENTINEL · DEFENDER ECOSYSTEM

Engineer security thatperforms under pressure.Resilient. Measurable. Uncompromising.

Spakto Security Engineering delivers enterprise-grade cloud defense architecture across Microsoft Sentinel and Defender ecosystems — from precision detection engineering and automated response playbooks to compliance-aligned hardening and continuous threat optimization.

Security Engineering · Active Defence Platform

Delivered End to End. Engineered to Perform.

Security Engineering is the disciplined architecture, deployment, and continuous optimisation of cloud-native Microsoft defence systems — transforming fragmented Sentinel, Defender XDR, and Azure tooling into a single intelligence-driven, automation-first ecosystem with measurable ATT&CK coverage, sub-6-minute MTTD, and full detection lifecycle governance.

Microsoft Sentinel SIEMDefender XDRCustom KQL EngineeringSOAR Logic AppsCIS/NIST HardeningATT&CK v15 · 430+ TechniquesMTTD < 6 minMTTR < 3 min
Platform Status
Detection EngineACTIVE
SOAR AutomationRUNNING
Threat Intel FeedLIVE
Posture MonitorONLINE
Alert Queue0 OPEN
Simulation EngineARMED
0+
ATT&CK Techniques Covered
MITRE v15 · all 14 tactic categories
0%
MITRE Detection Accuracy
validated via adversary simulation
0m
Mean Time to Detect
avg across identity · cloud · endpoint
↓0%
Log Cost Reduction
via threat-driven ingestion strategy
Live Threat Feed
Detection → Response Architecture Pipeline
01
Telemetry
47 sources
02
Ingest & Norm
1.2 TB/day
03
Detection
430 techs
04
SOAR & Auto
< 3m MTTR
05
Governance
94% score
Telemetry — Components
MDE Endpoint
Entra ID / AAD
M365 Mailboxes
Azure PaaS
Network Flows
MDTI Threat Feeds
// KQL — Impossible Travel Detection (Identity · TA0043)
SigninLogs
| where ResultType == 0 and isnotempty(Location)
| extend dist_km = geo_distance(prev_lng, prev_lat, Lng, Lat)
| where dist_km > 500 and time_diff < 3h
| extend Severity = "High", TTP = "T1078"
| project UPN, IP, Location, dist_km, Severity, TTP
Detection Domain Coverage
0%47 rules
Identity & Access
47 active detections
0%63 rules
Endpoint & EDR
63 active detections
0%38 rules
Cloud & Infrastructure
38 active detections
0%34 rules
Network & Lateral
34 active detections
ATT&CK Tactic Grid
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
40
11/12 tactic categories · 430+ techniques/sub-techniques
Zero Trust Foundation
Architecture-Driven Design
Multi-tenant Sentinel workspace hierarchy
300+ data connector configuration
Precision RBAC and least-privilege model
Hot/cold log tiering for cost governance
ASIM normalization schema engineering
Cross-workspace query federation
99.9% ingestion SLA
430+ ATT&CK Techniques
Precision Detection Logic
Custom KQL behavioral analytics rules
Statistical baseline + anomaly detection
UEBA entity graph correlation engine
MITRE ATT&CK v15 full tactic mapping
Detection lifecycle: design → validate
Hunt notebook library — 50+ notebooks
98% detection accuracy
Sub-3-Minute MTTR
Automation-First SOAR
Logic Apps incident enrichment chain
Automated identity containment (AAD)
EDR isolation trigger playbooks
SOC escalation and routing automation
MDTI + VirusTotal API enrichment
Executive breach notification workflows
< 3m mean containment
Measurable Posture
Continuous Governance
Detection lifecycle version control
Peer-review change management process
MTTD / MTTR weekly KPI measurement
CIS / NIST / SOC 2 compliance tracking
Microsoft Secure Score optimisation
Alert precision and noise ratio reporting
94% Secure Score avg
Engineering Maturity Framework
v4.1 · NIST CSF 2.0 Aligned

Build to L4. Defend at Scale.

Four progressive maturity levels from reactive log collection to intelligence-led adversary defense. We baseline your current state, define the engineering roadmap, and execute with measurable outcomes at every stage.

Platform Status
Active Engagements14
Avg Maturity LevelL2.8
L4 Clients6 / 14
Last AuditMar 2026
0%
Avg Maturity
Platform baseline across client engagements
0%
Noise Reduction
Alert noise eliminated at L4 vs L1 baseline
0%
Automation Rate
Analyst-free alert processing at L3+
0 wks
Time to L4
Engineering roadmap to intelligence-led defense
Maturity Progression Track — Select Level to Deep-Dive
01
Reactive Monitoring
25%
02
Structured Detection
55%
03
Automation-Driven SOC
78%
04
Intelligence-Led Defense
97%
Level 01
Reactive Monitoring
> 48h
MTTD
82%
False Pos

Basic log collection with manual triage and limited visibility across cloud and endpoint environments. No tuning, no correlation.

Engineering Stack
Azure Activity Logs
Basic Sentinel Workspace
Manual Alert Review
OOTB Detection Rules
Delivered Outcomes
Partial telemetry visibility
High analyst alert fatigue
No automated response
Compliance audit log only
Basic GDPR loggingAudit trail baseline
3 sprints
Engineering Effort
4–6 wks
Timeline
1/10
Complexity
Coverage by Level
L01 Reactive25%
L02 Structured55%
L03 Automated78%
L04 Intel-Led97%
L01 Performance Metrics
> 48h
MTTD
82%
False Pos
0%
Auto Rate
25%
Coverage
Capability Domain Progression — L1 → L4 Engineering Delta
L3 Score
L4 Score
97%L4
Detection Eng
L3: 79% → L4: 97%
94%L4
SOAR / Response
L3: 74% → L4: 94%
91%L4
Threat Hunting
L3: 55% → L4: 91%
96%L4
Intel Ops
L3: 40% → L4: 96%
Threat Coverage Framework · ATT&CK v15

Zero Blind Spots.
Signal-First Defense.

Every detection domain mapped to MITRE ATT&CK. Behavioral analytics, ML fusion scoring, and KQL-precision rules — engineered to close coverage gaps before adversaries exploit them.

Sensor Overview
ALL SENSORS ACTIVE
0
Active Rules
0.0m
Avg MTTD
0/14
ATT&CK Tactics
0.0%
Alert Precision
Coverage Radar
25%50%75%
Identity & Access
94%
Endpoint & EDR
91%
Cloud & Infrastructure
88%
Data Exfiltration
85%
Threat Intelligence
96%
Network & Lateral
79%
Detection Domain · Signal Analysis
Click domain → drill down
Domain 01
Identity & Access
94%
Coverage
4m
MTTD
47
Rules
Privilege EscalationToken AbuseImpossible TravelLateral MovementCredential Theft
Domain 02
Endpoint & EDR
91%
Coverage
2m
MTTD
63
Rules
Domain 03
Cloud & Infrastructure
88%
Coverage
6m
MTTD
38
Rules
Domain 04
Data Exfiltration
85%
Coverage
8m
MTTD
29
Rules
Domain 05
Threat Intelligence
96%
Coverage
< 1m
MTTD
82
Rules
Domain 06
Network & Lateral
79%
Coverage
5m
MTTD
34
Rules
Identity & Access
KQL Analytics Rule · Sentinel Workspace
94%
Coverage
47
Rules
4m
MTTD
analytics-rule.kql — identity-&-access.json
1// Impossible Travel Detection · Entra ID SigninLogs · TA0001 / T1078
2SigninLogs
3| where ResultType == 0 and isnotempty(Location)
4| extend dist_km = geo_distance(prev_lng, prev_lat, lng, lat)
5| where dist_km > 500 and time_diff < 3h
6| extend Severity = "High", TTP = "T1078"
7| project UPN, IP, Location, dist_km, Severity, TTP
Engineering Stack
Detection Engine
Defender for Identity + UEBA Engine
Rule Methodology
Behavioral + ML Anomaly Correlation
96%
Avg Confidence
3.1%
False Positive
47
Total Rules
94%
Coverage Score
Mapped Tactics
Privilege EscalationToken AbuseImpossible TravelLateral MovementCredential Theft
MITRE ATT&CK v15 · Kill-Chain Coverage
PRE-ATK
INFIL
POST
IMPACT
14 / 14
81%
RECON
TA0043
72%
RES.D
TA0042
97%
INIT.A
TA0001
94%
EXEC
TA0002
91%
PERS
TA0003
88%
PRIV.E
TA0004
86%
D.EVA
TA0005
92%
CRED.A
TA0006
79%
DISC
TA0007
85%
LAT.M
TA0008
83%
COLL
TA0009
91%
C2
TA0011
85%
EXFIL
TA0010
78%
IMPCT
TA0040
MICROSOFT SECURITY ECOSYSTEM · 6 ENGINEERING DOMAINS

Built Native on Microsoft.
Precision-Engineered Defense.

Six domains. One unified architecture — Microsoft Sentinel SIEM, Defender XDR, custom KQL detection engineering, Logic Apps SOAR, compliance hardening, and threat-driven log strategy.

0+
Data Connectors
0+
ATT&CK Techniques
0.0%
Ingestion Uptime
0%
Avg Secure Score
Architecture Stack
Telemetry Sources
6
Ingestion & Normalization
6
Detection Engine
6
Automation & SOAR
6
Governance & Reporting
6
ALL SYSTEMS OPERATIONAL
Engineering Domains
SIEM Platform
Sentinel Architecture
99.9%
Ingestion Uptime SLA
XDR Platform
Defender XDR Integration
< 2m
Alert Fusion Latency
Detection Logic
KQL Detection Engineering
430+
ATT&CK Techniques Covered
Automation
SOAR Automation
< 3m
Mean Containment Time
Compliance
Azure Compliance Hardening
94%
Avg Secure Score Achieved
Log Strategy
Threat Modeling & Log Strategy
↓ 31%
Avg Log Cost Reduction
SENTINEL ARCHITECTURESIEM Platform
99.9%Ingestion Uptime SLA
sentinel-analytics.kql · Sentinel Workspace
KQLSIEM Platform
1// Workspace · Hot/Cold Cost Governance · Usage Analytics
2Usage
3| where TimeGenerated > ago(30d) and IsBillable == true
4| summarize GB = round(sum(Quantity)/1024,2) by DataType
5| extend Tier = iff(GB > 50, "Hot-Analytics", "Cold-Archive")
6| extend MonthlyCost = round(GB * 2.76, 2)
7| order by MonthlyCost desc
Engineering Capabilities
Multi-workspace hierarchy design
300+ data connector configuration
KQL-optimized table schemas
Cost governance & hot/cold tiering
RBAC and access control model
Cross-workspace query optimization
Domain Metrics
12+
Workspaces
300+
Connectors
99.9%
Uptime SLA
180+
Log Tables

05 · Adversary Simulation

Attack. Detect. Validate.
Repeat until proven.

Every rule tested against real adversary TTPs. Every playbook validated under live breach simulation. Coverage is measured — never assumed.

0+
ATT&CK Techniques
0%
Detection Coverage
0
Custom KQL Rules
Kill Chain · Active Phase 1 of 5
SIMULATION ACTIVE
01Recon02Init Access03Execution04Persistence05Lateral06Collection07Exfil
atomic-runner · SPK-SIM-0847
LIVE
$ atomic-runner init --env azure-ad --profile APT29
[*] Loading ATT&CK v15.1 · 430 techniques mapped
[*] Target: Azure AD + O365 · 12-host surface
[+] Risk profile: Financial Services / Hybrid
[+] TTP set: T1566 · T1078 · T1021 · T1486
[*] Kill chain scoped: Recon → Exfiltration
[+] Threat model ready. 5 simulation phases queued.
MITRE ATT&CK · Coverage Heatmap
Covered
Gap
Flash = Live Test
Init Access
1566
1190
1133
1078
1199
Execution
1059
1106
1203
1204
1559
Persistence
1547
1098
1136
1546
1525
Priv Esc
1055
1134
1484
1611
1574
Credential
1003
1110
1555
1552
1528
Lateral Mov
1021
1550
1210
1534
1563
Exfiltration
1048
1041
1567
1537
1020
87
Tested
84
Detected
96.6%
Hit Rate
Detection Feed
CRIT09:14:23
Password Spray · Identity
T1110.003
✓ DETECTED
HIGH09:14:47
MFA Fatigue Push Detected
T1621
✓ DETECTED
MED09:15:01
Anomalous Token Refresh
T1528
⚠ GAP
HIGH09:15:14
PIM Escalation Chain
T1078.004
✓ DETECTED
96.6%
Det. Rate
3
Blind Spots
01
Threat Modeling

Map adversary TTPs to your industry, attack surface, and risk model usin

02
Attack Simulation

Execute controlled breach simulations across identity, endpoint, and clo

03
Detection Validation

Confirm analytics rules trigger accurately, measure false positive rates

04
SOAR Validation

Test automation playbooks for containment speed, enrichment accuracy, an

05
Coverage Reporting

Deliver MITRE-mapped visibility reports with MTTD, MTTR, alert precision

GOVERNANCE CONTROL PLANE · 6 ACTIVE CONTROL GATES

Zero-Tolerance Governance.
Audited. Versioned. Enforced.

Every rule, every change, every deployment is version-controlled, dual-reviewed, and validated before reaching production. Governance isn't a checkbox — it's the architecture that makes security measurable and reliable.

0%
Changes Version-Controlled
0+
Analytics Rules Governed
0%
Compliance Framework Cover
0
Unreviewed Deployments
gov-audit.logLIVE
▸ CHANGE AUDIT STREAM — TODAY
DEPLOY09:23:11
KQL-0847 · Identity Spray Detection v3.1
soc-eng · hash:f4a912b
REVIEW09:11:44
KQL-0846 · OAuth Consent Abuse Rule
lead-eng · PR#2341
STAGE08:45:02
KQL-0845 · PIM Escalation Chain Correlation
staging · FP:0/500
ALERT08:32:18WARN
Telemetry Gap · O365 Audit Log Latency +120s
monitor · INC-0092
DEPLOY08:18:55
PLAYBOOK-28 · Identity Containment v2.4
soar-eng · hash:c31e7a2
REVIEW07:55:33
PLAYBOOK-27 · BEC Auto-Remediation Chain
lead-eng · PR#2338
HARDEN07:41:09
CA Policy · Block Legacy Auth Scope Tightened
id-eng · CA-045
gov@ctrl:~$
ALL SYSTEMS OPERATIONAL
DEPLOY
REVIEW
STAGE
ALERT
DETECTION RULE LIFECYCLE · MANDATORY CONTROL GATES
01
Threat-Informed Design
02
Peer Engineering Review
03
Staging Validation
04
Production Deployment
05
Continuous Validation
GATE 01Design Review Gate
Threat-Informed Design
Every rule starts from ATT&CK threat intelligence mapped to your environment's actual telemetry surface.
Technique-level TTP mapping (ATT&CK v15)
Environment threat model alignment
Telemetry signal availability check
Estimated false-positive surface scan
Peer design review checklist sign-off
NIST CSF
NIST Cybersecurity Framework v2.0
96%
coverage
104/108 controls mapped
SOC 2 T2
SOC 2 Type II
94%
coverage
60/64 controls mapped
ISO 27001
ISO/IEC 27001:2022
91%
coverage
85/93 controls mapped
CIS v8
CIS Controls v8
98%
coverage
150/153 controls mapped
ADVERSARY SIMULATION PLATFORM · MITRE ATT&CK v15 · 430+ TECHNIQUES

Validation Through
Adversarial Simulation.
Tested. Mapped. Proven.

Every engineered detection validated against real adversary behavior — Atomic Red Team simulations, custom TTP scripts, and full kill-chain sequencing. Security is measured, not assumed.

0%
Alert Precision Rate
0+
ATT&CK Techniques Mapped
0%
SOAR Automation Rate
< 0m
Mean Time to Detect
VALIDATION PIPELINE · 5 GATES
01
Threat Modeling
TTPs Profiled
MITRE ATT&CKThreat Intel

ATT&CK technique selection driven by your threat model — industry, estate topology, and identified threat actor groups.

Industry threat actor profiling
M365 attack surface enumeration
Crown jewel identification
Technique relevance scoring
ATT&CK Navigator layer build
02
Attack Simulation
Red Team Active

Controlled Atomic Red Team and custom TTP script execution across identity, endpoint, and cloud attack surfaces.

Atomic Red Team playbooks
Custom PowerShell & Python TTPs
Azure AD / Entra ID simulation
Cloud workload exploit emulation
Full kill-chain sequencing
03
Detection Validation
Rules Fire Check

Every engineered KQL analytics rule validated for correct firing, false positive rate, and MTTD against SLA target.

Rule fire confirmation per TTP
FP rate measurement (500+ events)
MTTD measured vs < 6-min SLA
Blind-spot gap identification
KQL performance benchmarking
04
Automation Testing
SOAR Confirmed

Logic Apps playbooks validated end-to-end for containment speed, enrichment accuracy, and SOC escalation quality.

Containment speed test (< 3m)
Entity enrichment accuracy
SOC escalation routing check
Analyst handoff quality grade
Alert deduplication testing
05
Coverage Reporting
Report Delivered

Full MITRE-mapped detection coverage report with MTTD/MTTR KPIs, precision metrics, and remediation roadmap.

ATT&CK Navigator coverage export
MTTD/MTTR vs SLA delta report
Alert precision & noise metrics
Detection gap remediation roadmap
Executive posture score summary
MITRE ATT&CK v15 · TECHNIQUE COVERAGE MAP · 12 TACTIC DOMAINS
DETECTED
PARTIAL
MISSED
N/A
INIT
Initial Access
EXEC
Execution
PERS
Persistence
PRIV
Priv. Escalation
DEVA
Defense Evasion
CRED
Credential Access
DISC
Discovery
LATR
Lateral Movement
COLL
Collection
EXFL
Exfiltration
C2
Command & Control
IMPT
Impact
1566.001
1059.001
1053.005
1068
1055.012
1003.001
1087.002
1021.002
1005
1041
1071.001
1486
1566.002
1059.003
1098.001
1078.002
1562.001
1110.003
1482
1021.006
1039
1048.003
1095
1490
1078
1059.005
1547.001
1134.001
1027.002
1555.003
1069.002
1080
1114.001
1567.002
1572
1499.002
1190
1203
1543.003
1484.001
1218.011
1558.003
1046
1550.002
1560.001
1030
1132.001
1561.002
1195.001
1204.002
1136.001
1548.002
1036.005
1040
1057
1534
1056.001
1029
1573.001
1485
1200
1569.002
1505.003
1611
1070.004
1606.001
1018
1563.002
1185
1011
1008
1491.001
1091
1559.002
1133
1055
1564.003
1212
1083
1570
1213.002
1052
1219
1496
Detected: 68
Partial: 11
Missed: 1
Not Tested: 4
94% Coverage · 84 Techniques Simulated
LIVE
SOC PERFORMANCE TELEMETRY
SESSION · SEC-2025-E3F7A
UPTIME · 00:00:00
SOCSIEMSOARTI

LIVE OPERATIONAL METRICS

Measurable
Security.
Engineered Confidence.

Every detection rule, playbook, and ingestion decision is measured against live SOC KPIs — mapping performance to MITRE ATT&CK, compliance objectives, and executive risk targets.

0/ 100
MITRE Coverage
430 techniques · ATT&CK v15
0/ 100
SOC Health Score
composite performance index
0% ↓
FP Reduction
vs pre-engagement
0m
Mean MTTD
all 12 tactic domains
0% ↓
Log Cost Saved
ASIM normalization
31+
Active Alerts
across all domains
DOMAIN INTELLIGENCE MATRIX6 DOMAINS
REAL-TIME · 60s REFRESH
DOMAIN
TAG
COVERAGE
MTTD
PRECISION
ALERTS
TREND
Identity & Access
NOMINAL
IAM
98%
2m
96%
14
3%
degraded
Endpoint & EDR
WATCH
EDR
94%
1m
98%
8
12%
improved
Cloud Infrastructure
WATCH
CLOUD
88%
6m
91%
22
8%
degraded
Network Perimeter
WATCH
NET
92%
3m
94%
31
5%
improved
Email & Collaboration
NOMINAL
MAIL
96%
2m
97%
7
18%
improved
Data Exfiltration
ALERT
DLP
85%
8m
89%
5
2%
degraded
Avg Coverage92.2%
Avg Precision94.2%
Total Alerts87
Domains Online6/6
↻ AUTO-REFRESH 60s

Architecture

Security Architecture
Blueprint.

Five integrated architecture layers — telemetry precision, behavioral detection, automation-first response, and compliance-aligned governance operating as a unified system.

Telemetry Sources
Defender for Endpoint
Azure AD / Entra ID
M365 Mailboxes
Azure Workloads
Network Flows
3rd-Party Feeds
Ingestion & Normalization
Sentinel Workspaces
ASIM Schema Mapping
300+ Data Connectors
Log Analytics Tables
Ingestion Tiering
Cost Governance
Detection Engine
Custom KQL Analytics
UEBA / Behaviour
Fusion ML Model
MITRE ATT&CK Mapping
Watchlists
Hunting Notebooks
Automation & SOAR
Logic App Playbooks
Incident Enrichment
Auto-Containment
SOC Routing
Identity Lockdown
Evidence Collection
Governance & Reporting
Audit Dashboards
Compliance Evidence
Secure Score
MTTD/MTTR KPIs
Change Management
Risk Reporting
Sentinel Detection Lab

KQL Detection Engineering
Live Rule Simulation

Every detection rule is authored, precision-tested, and MITRE-mapped before production. Select a rule below to inspect its KQL logic and run a live simulation against telemetry.

R-001Impossible Travel DetectionKQL
TACTICInitial Access
TECHNIQUET1078.004
SEVERITYHigh
sentinel-simulation.sh
// Click RUN SIMULATION to test rule against 72h telemetry window
Architecture Diagram

Microsoft Security Stack
Integrated Architecture Blueprint

Every layer is purpose-engineered — from telemetry collection to compliance reporting. Hover a layer to inspect the data flow and component responsibilities.

Telemetry SourcesEndpointsMDEIdentityEntra IDCloudAzure/M365NetworkNSG / FWIngestion & NormalizationData CollectionDCE/DCRLog AnalyticsWorkspaceNormalizationASIMDetection EngineKQL AnalyticsCustom RulesML ModelsFusion / UEBAThreat IntelTIP / MDTIAutomation & ResponseSOAR PlaybooksLogic AppsAuto TriageEnrichmentOrchestrationSentinelGovernance & ReportingWorkbooksDashboardsComplianceNIST / ISOKPI EngineMTTD / MTTR
Telemetry Sources
EndpointsIdentityCloudNetwork
Ingestion & Normalization
Data CollectionLog AnalyticsNormalization
Detection Engine
KQL AnalyticsML ModelsThreat Intel
Automation & Response
SOAR PlaybooksAuto TriageOrchestration
Governance & Reporting
WorkbooksComplianceKPI Engine
Daily Telemetry Volume
Endpoints4.2B/day
Identity890M/day
Cloud6.1B/day
Network340M/day
SOAR Automation Engine

Automated Response Playbooks
Live Execution Simulation

Every response playbook is engineered as code — version-controlled, peer-reviewed, and continuously validated. Select a playbook below and click Run to simulate execution.

Impossible Travel Auto-Triage
Sentinel Alert · T1078.004
1
Alert IngestiontriggerAUTO
Sentinel webhook fires Logic App trigger via Azure Monitor alert rule
2
Entity EnrichmentenrichAUTO
Query AAD for user risk level, MFA state, sign-in history, and device compliance
3
Geo-Distance CalccomputeAUTO
Compute travel distance using IP geolocation API; compare against identity baseline velocity
4
Risk Threshold CheckdecisionAUTO
If distance > 500km AND time_delta < 60min: classify as Impossible Travel
5
MFA Force & Session KillcontainAUTO
Invoke Conditional Access policy; revoke all active refresh tokens via MS Graph API
6
Threat Intel LookupenrichAUTO
Cross-reference source IP against MDTI, VirusTotal, and internal blocklist
7
Analyst Assignmentroute
Route enriched incident to Tier-2 queue with full context package and severity label
8
SLA NotificationnotifyAUTO
Trigger 15-minute SLA countdown; notify SOC manager if unacknowledged
Playbook KPIs
Avg Execution Time38s
Success Rate97%
Auto Steps7/8
MTTR Contribution↓ 68%
execution.log
// Awaiting playbook execution...
Playbook Library
Total Playbooks127
Avg Steps/PB8.4
% Fully Auto73%
Implementation

Deployment Process Overview

A structured four-phase methodology to deploy, validate, and continuously evolve your security engineering stack.

01
Assess

Initial Assessment & Planning

We evaluate your Azure environment, security posture, existing SIEM/XDR tools, log sources, compliance requirements, and threat exposure to design a tailored security architecture.

02
Engineer

Custom Configuration & Engineering

Sentinel workspaces, Defender policies, KQL detections, automation playbooks, role-based access controls, and alert tuning are configured according to your operational model.

03
Deploy

Deployment & Validation Testing

We deploy across environments, simulate attack scenarios, validate detection logic, test automation workflows, and confirm telemetry integrity before production go-live.

04
Optimise

Continuous Monitoring & Optimization

Post-deployment, we provide tuning, detection refinement, cost optimization, log normalization, compliance alignment, and threat-driven enhancements to keep defenses adaptive.

Security Engineering FAQs

Frequently asked
questions.

Still have questions?
Our security engineers answer within one business day.
Ask a question