Huntress Acquires Inside Agent: A New Era for Identity ProtectionFree Trial
Menu
InvestorsCareersBlogAboutAcademySupportContact
LoginSign up
RANSOMWARE RESILIENCE TESTING · KILL CHAIN SIMULATION · INCIDENT READINESS VALIDATION

Don't wait for ransomware.Simulate it first.Validate every defense.

Ransomware follows predictable kill chains. Spakto safely simulates every stage — from initial access to encryption — to validate whether your controls, detection, backups, and response teams can actually stop and recover from a ransomware attack before it happens.

The average ransom payment is $1.5M. Downtime averages 22 days.
40% of data remains irrecoverable — even after paying the ransom.

These are not hypothetical scenarios. They are the documented outcomes of organisations that believed they were prepared — and discovered they were not.

What Spakto Validates
🔗

Full Kill Chain Emulation

Safe simulation of all 7 attack stages — initial access to encryption

💾

Backup Recovery Validation

Technical testing of backup integrity and RTO/RPO achievement

🌐

Lateral Movement Testing

Domain propagation and segmentation gap discovery across infra

📤

Double Extortion Simulation

Encryption plus data exfiltration scenarios — both vectors tested

IR Team Readiness

Response time measurement and playbook validation under pressure

🔍

Detection Gap Analysis

SOC and EDR rule coverage mapped against every kill chain stage

MITRE ATT&CK Aligned

The Seven-Stage Kill Chain

Every ransomware attack follows the same path. We simulate all seven stages safely — then prove you can stop them.

Attack Progression

Low
CRITICAL
01
Stage 1 · ENTRYHIGH

Initial Access

Phishing, exposed RDP, VPN exploits, supply chain compromise

T1190T1566T1078
1/7
02
Stage 2 · FOOTHOLDHIGH

Persistence & Evasion

Scheduled tasks, registry modifications, AV/EDR tampering

T1053T1562
2/7
03
Stage 3 · MAPPINGMEDIUM

Internal Reconnaissance

AD enumeration, network discovery, backup location mapping

T1018T1069
3/7
04
Stage 4 · SPREADINGMEDIUM

Lateral Movement

Pass-the-Hash, RDP hijacking, SMB lateral movement to DCs

T1550T1021
4/7
05
Stage 5 · CONTROLLOW

Privilege Escalation

Domain admin compromise, DCSync, Golden Ticket creation

T1003T1558
5/7
06
Stage 6 · EXFILLOW

Data Exfiltration

Data identification, compression, exfil to attacker-controlled storage

T1048T1560
6/7
07
Stage 7 · IMPACTCRITICAL

Encryption & Ransom

Safe encryption simulation, ransom note drop, backup destruction attempt

T1486
7/7

Full Spectrum Coverage

What Spakto
Validates End-to-End

7
Kill Chain Stages
14+
MITRE Techniques
0
Production Impact
100%
Safe Simulation

Detection Window by Stage

Stages 1–2
HIGH
Stages 3–4
MEDIUM
Stages 5–7
LOW–CRIT

Report Deliverables

Detection gap analysis per stage
MTTD & containment metrics
Backup recoverability results
Prioritised remediation roadmap
Request Kill Chain Testing
All 7 stages simulated safely — zero production impact, zero real encryption
SOC Coverage · Detection Heatmap

Where your detections
are — and aren't.

Every security tool measured against every ransomware kill chain stage. Red = high detection rate (tool covers that stage). Grey = blind spot — the attack goes undetected.

Initial Access
48%
Persistence
34%
Recon
36%
Lateral Move
36%
Priv Escalation
39%
Exfiltration
24%
Encryption
24%
EDR42%
SIEM36%
NDR42%
UEBA50%
Email GW17%
Backup Mon19%
MED
LOW
MED
MED
MED
LOW
LOW
DETECTION RATE:
70–100%
45–69%
20–44%
0–19%
Hover a cell to inspect coverage
Critical Blind Spots
Encryption / EDR
T1486
15%
Encryption / SIEM
T1486
10%
Initial Access / NDR
T1190
30%
Persistence / NDR
T1053
20%
Exfiltration / EDR
T1048
20%
Overall Avg Coverage
34%
across all tools × stages
↑ Target: 75%+ for ransomware readiness
Resilience Stress-Testing

Four Validation Areas

Where most defences collapse under real ransomware pressure — Spakto stress-tests each dimension with evidence-based measurement.

83%
orgs fail to detect lateral movement
67%
backups are not truly isolated
4.7h
avg containment vs 15m target

Area 01

Detection & Response

4.7h
avg MTTD · target <15m

Can your SOC detect early kill chain stages — initial access, persistence, lateral movement — before encryption begins? Most environments have critical blind spots.

Alert generation at each kill chain stage
EDR & SIEM rule coverage against TTPs
SOC escalation and triage speed
False-positive noise vs signal ratio
Detection coverage across 7 stagesTest result →
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7

Industry average — detection degrades sharply at later stages

Area 02

Lateral Movement

4.2h
avg time to reach Domain Controller
Critical
exposure risk

Can attackers move from initial foothold to domain controllers and crown-jewel systems? Segmentation gaps are exposed here.

Pass-the-Hash & Pass-the-Ticket
SMB / RDP lateral propagation
Network segmentation enforcement
Backup server reachability from workstations
Workstation
Server
DC
Backup

Attacker reach path — all nodes tested

Area 03

Backup Integrity

67%
of backup systems can be reached by attackers
High Risk
exposure level

Are your backups truly air-gapped? Ransomware specifically targets backup systems. We test isolation, deletion resistance, and recovery speed.

Backup isolation from production network
Deletion & encryption resistance testing
Restoration time vs RTO target
Backup integrity & completeness check

Recovery Objective Validation

RTO target
4h
RPO target
1h
Restoration test
Passed?

Area 04

Containment Speed

4.7h
avg isolation time · target <15m

Once ransomware is detected, can you isolate infected systems in minutes — or does the malware spread across the network for hours before containment? Speed is everything.

Endpoint isolation workflow timing
Network quarantine automation test
IR playbook step-by-step validation
Clean system restoration from backup
Containment timeline benchmark
T+0Detect
T+12mAlert
T+45mTriage
T+4.7hIsolate
T+8hContain

Industry average timeline — Spakto measures your actual numbers

All four dimensions tested and measured — gaps documented with evidence-based findings
Start Validation →
Safe Simulation Engine · T1486

Encryption simulated.
Zero real files touched.

Spakto's safe simulation engine replicates the exact behaviour of LockBit 3.0, BlackCat and RansomHub — file enumeration, VSS deletion, intermittent encryption patterns — without modifying a single byte of production data.

filesystem_scan — spakto_sim.exe
·
payroll_2024.xlsxhigh
C:\Finance\
2.4 MB
·
customer_db_export.csvhigh
C:\CRM\exports\
18.3 MB
·
network_config.xmlhigh
C:\System\configs\
340 KB
·
backup_schedule.jsonhigh
C:\Backup\
12 KB
·
dc_passwords_temp.txthigh
C:\Admin\
4 KB
·
quarterly_report_q3.pdfmedium
C:\Reports\
5.1 MB
·
architecture_diagram.vsdmedium
C:\Projects\
890 KB
·
email_archive_2023.pstmedium
C:\Users\jsmith\
4.2 GB
·
source_code_repo.zipmedium
C:\Dev\
122 MB
·
hr_policies.docxlow
C:\HR\
2.1 MB
·
office_intranet.htmllow
C:\Web\
34 KB
·
desktop_wallpaper.pnglow
C:\Users\Public\
780 KB
flagged
safe
scanning
·pending
spakto_simulation_log.txt
Scroll into view to activate
Click a file to inspect · Run simulation to begin
Zero bytes encrypted · Zero production impact · 100% safe simulation
Zero-Risk Testing Framework

Safe Simulation Explained

Full kill chain coverage with zero production disruption — here's exactly what our testing framework does and what it never will.

0
Production incidents ever
0
Data loss events
100%
Engagements documented
01

Step 01

Scoped Access

Written scope agreement, defined systems, time-boxed window, dedicated engagement comms channel

02

Step 02

Safe TTP Simulation

Attacker TTPs replicated with zero-harm techniques — no real malware, no destructive payloads, no data exfil

03

Step 03

Evidence Report

Every action logged with timestamps, gap analysis per stage, detection metrics, remediation priorities

SAFE

Approved Activities

What We DO

AUTHORISED

Simulate attacker TTPs using safe techniques

MITRE-mapped, evidence-logged

Test detection and response workflows

SOC alert validation per stage

Validate backup recoverability

Restoration timing + integrity check

Measure containment time

MTTD & MTTR benchmarked

Provide evidence-based gap report

Prioritised remediation roadmap

NEVER

Prohibited Actions

What We NEVER DO

GUARANTEED

Execute real malware or encryption

Simulation only — zero destructive payload

Cause data loss or corruption

All file operations are read-only or sandboxed

Disrupt production systems

Strictly scoped, off-peak if required

Access data outside agreed scope

Written scope boundary enforced at all times

Leave persistent access after assessment

All access revoked, activity logs provided

Zero-risk guarantee — every engagement operates under strict safety protocols and a written scope agreement
See Full Methodology →
Backup Integrity · Recovery Validation

Backups tested under
ransomware conditions.

67% of organisations discover backup failures during an actual ransomware incident. Spakto validates every backup system — isolation, encryption, MFA, recovery speed, and recoverability — before attackers expose the gaps.

2
Isolated
2
At Risk
1
Compromised
18
Findings
3 backup systems vulnerable to ransomware destruction — immediate isolation required
Backup System
Coverage
Hardened
RTO
Backup Status
Recovery
Veeam Backup & Replication
On-Prem Backup · Local NAS + Tape
72%
IMM
MFA
4h
RPO 24h
At Risk
Partial
Azure Backup
Cloud Backup · Azure Storage (LRS)
88%
IMM
MFA
8h
RPO 4h
Isolated
Validated
SQL Server Native Backup
Database Backup · C:\Backup\ (local disk)
45%
IMM
MFA
2h
RPO 1h
Compromised
Untested
Veeam Cloud Connect
Offsite Replication · Service Provider DC
61%
IMM
MFA
12h
RPO 8h
At Risk
Partial
SharePoint / OneDrive
M365 Backup · Microsoft 365
95%
IMM
MFA
1h
RPO 30m
Isolated
Validated
Bare-Metal Recovery (BMR)
Disaster Recovery · Secondary site
38%
IMM
MFA
24h
RPO 48h
Unknown
Untested
Select a backup system to inspect findings
3-2-1 Backup Rule
3 copies of data
Veeam + Azure + SQL native
2 different media types
On-prem disk + cloud storage
1 copy offsite
Azure + Veeam CC
1 copy air-gapped
No true air-gap detected
1 copy immutable
Azure + M365 immutability enabled
Recovery tested &lt;90d
BMR: 14 months · SQL: never
Adversary Intelligence

Threat Actor Profiles

Spakto simulates TTPs from the most prolific ransomware groups active today — so your defences are tested against real-world adversary behaviour.

9
Groups Profiled
5,500+
Known Victims
3
Disrupted by LEA
Russia-linkedHIGHLY ACTIVE

LockBit 3.0

BITWISE SPIDER

Threat

5/5

2019
First seen
2,000+
Victims
Triple
Extortion

Target Sectors

HealthcareManufacturingFinanceGovt

Known TTPs

Phishing / RDP brute-force
StealBit exfiltration tool
Self-spreading worm module

Notable

Largest RaaS operator by victim count; $91M extorted from US alone

Russia-linkedACTIVE

ALPHV/BlackCat

SCATTERED SPIDER

Threat

5/5

2021
First seen
500+
Victims
Triple
Extortion

Target Sectors

Enterprise ITCritical InfraHealthcare

Known TTPs

Rust-based cross-platform binary
Intermittent encryption mode
API-based data exfiltration

Notable

First major Rust ransomware; disrupted by FBI in Dec 2023 — resurged

Ukraine-linkedACTIVE

Cl0p

GRACEFUL SPIDER

Threat

4/5

2019
First seen
800+
Victims
Double
Extortion

Target Sectors

EnterpriseGovernmentManufacturingEducation

Known TTPs

Zero-day exploitation (MOVEit, GoAnywhere)
Mass data theft without encryption
Extortion via data leak site

Notable

MOVEit campaign compromised 2,000+ organisations in 2023

Russia-linkedHIGHLY ACTIVE

BlackBasta

CARBON SPIDER

Threat

5/5

2022
First seen
500+
Victims
Double
Extortion

Target Sectors

HealthcareFinanceConstructionLegal

Known TTPs

QakBot / Pikabot initial access
Cobalt Strike post-exploitation
ESXi hypervisor encryption

Notable

Emerged post-Conti shutdown; shares TTPs and personnel with Conti

Origin unknownACTIVE

Akira

PUNK SPIDER

Threat

4/5

2023
First seen
250+
Victims
Double
Extortion

Target Sectors

SMBProfessional ServicesEducation

Known TTPs

Cisco VPN credential abuse (no MFA)
AnyDesk / WinRAR for exfil
Targets VeeamVault backups

Notable

Exploits VPN devices without MFA; $42M collected in first year

Origin unknownHIGHLY ACTIVE

RansomHub

VOID RABISU

Threat

5/5

2024
First seen
300+
Victims
Double
Extortion

Target Sectors

Critical InfraHealthcareWaterIT

Known TTPs

ZeroLogon / Zerologon privilege escalation
Intermittent encryption for speed
Affiliate-first model — high payouts

Notable

Fastest growing RaaS in 2024; recruited LockBit & ALPHV affiliates post-takedown

Likely LatAmACTIVE

Play

PLAYCRYPT

Threat

3/5

2022
First seen
300+
Victims
Double
Extortion

Target Sectors

MSPSMBNonprofitsLegal

Known TTPs

MSP supply-chain pivot to clients
ProxyNotShell Exchange exploitation
Custom .PLAY extension encryption

Notable

Systematically targets MSPs to access hundreds of downstream clients

US-based (ex-Conti)ACTIVE

Royal

DEV-0569

Threat

4/5

2022
First seen
350+
Victims
Double
Extortion

Target Sectors

FinanceEnergyHealthcareEducation

Known TTPs

Callback phishing (fake IT support)
Intermittent encryption (evades heuristics)
Partial encryption for speed

Notable

$275M in demands; FBI advisory issued; rebranded as BlackSuit in 2024

Disrupted — FBIDISRUPTED

Hive

HIVE RANSOMWARE

Threat

2/5

2021
First seen
1,500+
Victims
Double
Extortion

Target Sectors

HealthcareNGORetailSchools

Known TTPs

Healthcare-focused targeting
RDP & VPN credential theft
Affiliate RaaS with 80/20 split

Notable

FBI infiltrated infrastructure Jan 2023; decryption keys provided to 300+ victims

Spakto maps all TTPs to MITRE ATT&CK and simulates them safely across your environment
Test Your Defences →
IR Effectiveness Testing

Incident Response Readiness

Most IR plans look good on paper but fail under real pressure. We stress-test four critical dimensions of your incident response capability.

62%
orgs lack tested IR playbook
4.5h
avg time to declare IR incident
38%
backups never recovery-tested
01

Dimension 01

Playbook Validation

Test your IR playbook against real attack scenarios — does it cover every stage of the kill chain with clear decision trees and escalation paths?

IR playbook coverage across all 7 kill chain stages
Decision tree completeness & escalation paths
Gap analysis against NIST & PICERL framework
Industry finding: avg 3.2 kill chain stages not covered by existing playbooks
02

Dimension 02

Team Response Time

Measure detection-to-containment time across realistic ransomware scenarios. Speed is everything — every minute of delay is lateral spread.

Detection-to-containment stopwatch measurement
Alert triage speed under realistic attack load
On-call response time & escalation chain timing
T+0
T+12m
T+4.7h
Contained
Industry avg: 4.7h detection-to-containment · Spakto target: <15 minutes
03

Dimension 03

Communication Chain

Validate escalation procedures, executive notification workflows, legal and PR coordination, and regulator breach notification readiness.

Executive notification workflow & timing test
Legal & PR breach coordination protocol
Regulator / breach notification readiness (GDPR, HIPAA)
SOC
CISO
Legal
Exec
Regulator
62% of organisations have never tested their executive comms process under a real incident
04

Dimension 04

Recovery Procedures

Tabletop and technical testing of backup restoration workflows, RTO/RPO achievement, and business continuity plan activation under simulated ransomware.

Backup restoration speed from known-good state
RTO & RPO validation under simulated ransomware
Business continuity plan activation & handover test
RTO (target)
RPO (target)
Restoration test
38% of organisations have never performed a live recovery test — Spakto validates it technically
All four IR dimensions measured and benchmarked — results delivered in a board-ready readiness report
Test IR Readiness →
IR Timeline · Response Validation

Every minute matters.
Your actual vs target response.

This is the real incident timeline — not what your runbook says will happen, but what our testing reveals actually happens. Every gap between target and actual response time is a business continuity risk.

Actual vs Target Recovery
2d
actual · target 8h
6× over target
8 gaps identified
T+0m
DETFirst malicious activityGAP

Ransomware drops first payload — no alert generated by EDR (T1566.002)

target
T+0m
T+45m
DETSIEM alert generatedGAP

Unusual process creation alert fires — low-priority ticket opened

target
T+5m
+40m late
T+2h
DETSOC analyst reviews alertGAP

Analyst triages alert — escalates to Tier 2 (2h dwell already accumulated)

target
T+15m
+2h late
T+3h
DETIncident declaredGAP

T2 confirms ransomware activity, IR lead notified, war room stood up

target
T+20m
+3h late
T+4h
CONNetwork segmentationGAP

Firewall rules updated to isolate affected subnet — 3 hosts already compromised

target
T+30m
+3h late
T+4h
CONHost isolationGAP

EDR remote-isolate triggered on 6 endpoints — 1 critical server missed

target
T+35m
+3h late
T+5h
CONAD credential reset

All domain admin passwords rotated, Golden Ticket invalidated

target
T+1h
+4h late
T+8h
ERAMalware artefacts removed

Cobalt Strike beacons, dropper files and registry persistence keys cleaned

target
T+2h
+6h late
T+10h
ERAForensic imaging complete

All affected hosts imaged for legal evidence — chain of custody established

target
T+3h
+7h late
T+12h
RECBackup restore initiatedGAP

Azure cloud backup restore started — on-prem backup found corrupted (as expected)

target
T+4h
+8h late
T+16h
RECCore systems online

Domain controller, email and critical apps restored to last clean checkpoint

target
T+8h
+8h late
T+1d
RECBusiness operations resumeGAP

Full service restoration — 24h total downtime vs 4h RTO target

target
T+4h
+20h late
T+2d
PIRoot cause analysis published

Full incident report with IOCs, timeline, MITRE mapping and remediation roadmap

target
T+2d
Click an event to inspect
Phase Duration
Detection3h
Containment2h
Eradication2h
Recovery12h
Post-Incident0m
Key Metrics
MTTD (detect)
3h/ 15m
MTTC (contain)
4h/ 30m
MTTR (recover)
24h/ 4h
Gaps identified
8/ 0

Ransomware Resilience FAQs

Frequently asked
questions.

Still have questions?
Our security engineers answer within one business day.
Ask a question